Relationship between fork length (FL) at capture and (A) otolith size

By A Mystery Man Writer

Download scientific diagram | Relationship between fork length (FL) at capture and (A) otolith size (OS) measured across transverse sections and (B) scale size (SS) measured from the focus to the anterior edge. Regression lines depict linear (dashed lines) and logarithmic fits (solid lines). For A, linear: OS = 1.89 + 0.09 · FL, r 2 = 0.94; log: OS = 3.29 · log e FL – 6.32, r 2 = 0.95. For B, linear: SS = –0.12 + 0.07 · FL, r 2 = 0.88; log: SS = 2.38 · log e FL – 6.07, r 2 = 0.89. from publication: Longitudinal Length Back-Calculations from Otoliths and Scales Differ Systematically in Haddock | Parallel macrostructure analysis of otoliths versus scales was conducted on Georges Bank Haddock Melanogrammus aeglefinus sampled in spring 2011 to test whether annuli widths of both structures yield comparable estimates of back-calculated length at age. While generally | Otolith, Otolithic Membrane and Fish | ResearchGate, the professional network for scientists.

Relation between square root of otolith area and fork length (FL

Frontiers Length-Weight Relationships and Otolith-Based Growth

Biometrics of Aquatic Animals

Claudia GÜNTHER, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, CAU, Forschungs- und Technologiezentrum Westküste (FTZ)

Relationship between fork length (FL) at capture and (A) otolith

Decoupling of otolith and somatic growth during anadromous

Percentage of otoliths with opaque edge at age 3 and 6 in the central

Larval and juvenile Longfin Smelt diets as a function of fish size

Experimental validation of otolith-based age and growth